instr

Free Web Hosting Provider - Web Hosting - E-commerce - High Speed Internet - Free Web Page

1) "ION CREANGA" high school, Bucuresti, Romania

Indicators of the performance for the project evaluation.
Our school team decided to evaluate for the first year of the project:
· teachers' management skills (B7),
· teachers' citizenship(B8),
· Involvement of the whole school(C5),
· Project visibility, products and results (C6)
· Communication (D3)
· Evaluation (D5)

For B7, B8, C5 we decided to have 3 stages of evaluation.

-One this month,
-one after the teacher exchange
-other at the end of the year.
For C6 on Mars and at the end of the year,
for D3 when will be necessary and at the end of the year
for D5 at the end of the year.

The responsable with evaluation for the Romanian team is Florica Alexandrescu, a biology teacher.

2) "NICOLAE POPOVICIU " Low Secondary School, Beius Romania

The indicators of the performances for the evaluation of the project for The Second Romanian Team:

B2-Foreign language skills/awareness
B6-ITC skills
C3-Cross curricular approach
C5-Involvement of the whole school
C6-Project visibility, products, results
D3-Comunication

We will evaluate after the following plan:

B2-at the end of the scholar year
B6- at the end of the scholar year
C3,C5, C6- Dec and at the end of the scholar year
D3- Dec and at the end of the scholar year

Responsabile for evaluation of the project for The Second Romanian Team: Maria David, Sports Teacher and the deputy principal of the school

3) Escola Secundária de José Estêvão * Aveiro, Portugal

The Portuguise team decided to evaluate:

A2-Sudents - Foreign languages skills/awareness...
B2-Teachers - Foreign languages skill/ awareness...
B3-Teachers - Teaching skills
B8-Teachers - European citinzenchip
D3-Project -Communication
D5-Project - Evaluation

4) Subject of evaluation for Raayland College Netherlands

· Subject skills for teachers (B1)
· Effects of the European project on the teachers' European citizenship awareness (B8)
· The effects of the European project on the school policy (C2)
· The visibility of the project at school (C6)
· The communication between the project partners (C6)
· Evaluation of the evaluation-activities in the project. (D5)

5) Staatliche Fachoberschule und Berufsoberschule Kaufbeuren, Germany

- Subject skills (B1)
- Teaching Skills (B3)
- Teachers' management skills (B7)
- Project Visibility, products and results (C6)
- Communication (D3)

6) 20th Gimnasio Lamia, Greece

The greek delagation decided to evaluate:

*B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7, B8
*C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9
* D3, D4, D5

using the 7th D instrument (Group discussion with the teachers)

7) LICEO SCIENTIFICO "LEONARDO DA VINCI" Sora, ITALY

A1, A4, B1, B8, D3, D5 (?)

8) STREDNI ZDRAVOTNICKA SKOLA, Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC

We, at last, decided to evaluate the following aspects of MICE:
A2 - Students - Foreign language (skills/awarenes)
A5 - Students - Social skills
B7 - Teachers - Managment skills
C6 - Project visibility, products, results (effect s on schools)
D3 - Project Communication
The subject to evaluate will be National and Foreign language

9) Kossuth Lajos Gimnazium es Szakkozepiskola

The Hungarian team made the following decision about MICE instruments:
B2 Teachers Foreign language skills
B4 Teachers Motivation
B5 Teachers Social skills
B8 Teachers European citizenship
C5 School Involvement of the whole school
D3 Partnership Communication

The responsible person is: Gasparne Timko Erzsebet

Rodica Barlau-2002